<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Capitol Hill Battles Over Twitter and Blackberries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/</link>
	<description>The Technology of Power in a Digital World.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Dave;
   It appears to me that government of the people, for the people and by the people has no meaning to those in power who want to remain in power.

   If the politicians start using sites full of ads and political statements, the public will avoid these sites, just as we do now for sites full of ads and pop-ups.

   By in large, the public is smarter than Congress thinks we are.

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave;<br />
   It appears to me that government of the people, for the people and by the people has no meaning to those in power who want to remain in power.</p>
<p>   If the politicians start using sites full of ads and political statements, the public will avoid these sites, just as we do now for sites full of ads and pop-ups.</p>
<p>   By in large, the public is smarter than Congress thinks we are.</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Dugan</title>
		<link>http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Dugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Dave - This is great. I think this gives me a totally different, but more interesting post. Will link of course. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave &#8211; This is great. I think this gives me a totally different, but more interesting post. Will link of course. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; links for 2008-07-10&#160;by&#160;Kevin Bondelli&#8217;s Youth Vote Blog</title>
		<link>http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; links for 2008-07-10&#160;by&#160;Kevin Bondelli&#8217;s Youth Vote Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/#comment-426</guid>
		<description>[...] CapitalGig » Blog Archive » Capitol Hill Battles Over Twitter and Blackberries [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CapitalGig » Blog Archive » Capitol Hill Battles Over Twitter and Blackberries [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Nicoll</title>
		<link>http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Nicoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitalgig.com/2008/07/09/capitol-hill-battles-over-twitter-and-blackberries/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>I agree!  Seriously - what&#039;s the reason for shutting down communication between a congress person and the people they are supposed to represent.  What&#039;s going to happen: are they going to have higher chance of being bought off?  There&#039;s already plenty of opportunity for that, they will sell out if they want to.  Restricting communication is not going to change anything.  God forbid that they actually *talk* to people and find out what they want.  Oh no!  They won&#039;t be under the influence of lobbyists as much!  Whatever shall we do??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree!  Seriously &#8211; what&#8217;s the reason for shutting down communication between a congress person and the people they are supposed to represent.  What&#8217;s going to happen: are they going to have higher chance of being bought off?  There&#8217;s already plenty of opportunity for that, they will sell out if they want to.  Restricting communication is not going to change anything.  God forbid that they actually *talk* to people and find out what they want.  Oh no!  They won&#8217;t be under the influence of lobbyists as much!  Whatever shall we do??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

